I replied to Greg's post as far as how my reply to your post was. Here's what I wrote so I don't have to retype it cause I type like a SNAIL!



I must admit I didn't even really read Ryans post. I just saw the post and replied in more of an inside on going debate that Ryan and myself have had in the past kind of way. It's always been friendly but it always ends up happening whenever there is a Sharp Kahl debate. In this case he never mentioned Sharps as you stated but like i explained above I meant it more as an inside joke but until this morning I didn't even look at what I wrote or I should say how I wrote it. When I read it over this morning I can definitely see where it came out in more of a rude way instead of a harsh joking way. I didn't mean for it to sound like I was being a huge a-hole but thats how it looks so sorry for that part to Ryan and everyone else who took offence.



So, sorry about the old thread JACKING LOL I meant it more as a joke but it didn't really come out that way. Oh,and just for the sake of argument the pair that was used to make the first Sharp sunglow also weren't anything special so we're equal there!



Goodluck wit all your pairingsthis year!





Ruben Michel

[ Show Entire Thread ]