![]() | market - home |
![]() |
News & Events:
|
| [ Login ] [ User Prefs ] [ Search Forums ] [ Back to Main Page ] [ Back to Crested Geckos ] |
Posted by: MarthaStewart at Wed May 21 13:10:22 2003 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by MarthaStewart ] ok im jsut really confused now. I always thought the definition of a fire/flame morph was the presence of very evidently white markings along the dorsal crests. Not the stripey pattern that you see, i think thats what you call a tiger. Ive asked many breeders now whether they have dark fires, fires etc and many have shown me just striped (without white) phase cresteds. Am i wrong???? is a fire/flame morph really just the striipey pattern and not the white stuff on the back??? if so then what do you call a crested with the creammy white pattern on its back??? | ||
>> Next Message: RE: The proper definition of a "fire/flame" ??? - Captive_Science, Wed May 21 17:33:24 2003 >> Next Message: Clarification - Captive_Science, Wed May 21 17:36:30 2003 >> Next Message: RE: The proper definition of a "fire/flame" ??? - EricKlees, Wed May 21 21:39:39 2003 | ||
|
|
|
|