A possibility for the offensive. What would it take to get a law passed that would require a charity's name to reflect what they are really about? HSUS gets most of their funding from people who think their money is going to help animal shelters. Would it be possible to get them to change their name to something that makes it obvious they are an animal rights organization? Do you think PeTA and API could have gotten Microsoft and Bank of America to take them on as a beneficiary? The animal rights movement gets most of its funding because of that name (HSUS). If we could somehow make it where the AR movement only got donations from truly animal rights minded people, then they wouldn't have near the power they do now. They would be the ones doing damage controll. Wayne Pacelle would have to look for a real job. What would really make it nice would be if we could choose the name for them. I know I'm dreaming, lol.

Well, just a few thoughts. If anyone has some better Ideas along those lines, please share. If the AR groups can get law makers to listen to their whining, we should be able to get them to listen to reason.

Thanks for reading guys.



Alan,

[ Show Entire Thread ]