I understand this is a stretch...I found this about house resolutions.

3. CANNOT AUTHORIZE BY RESOLUTION AN ACT IN VIOLATION
OF AN EXISTING STATUTE. — H.C.R. 122, authorizing the Game, Fish
and Oyster Department to issue complimentary hunting licenses to outof-state sportsmen, was before the house.Rule 10 Sec. 7
10- 153 - 1-12-07 HR 310Mr. Alsup raised a point of order against the resolution on the ground that such authorization would be in violation of existing statute, and that the legislature had no authority to change a statute except by bill.

The resolution Hilderbran and Estes created had an enormous amount of crap in it. Perhaps something in there is in violation of an existing statute?

[ Show Entire Thread ]