Posted by:
rainbowsrus
at Thu Jun 7 10:45:02 2007 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by rainbowsrus ]
LOL, saw that, stumbled over it, figured wht you meant and went on.
A possible super to a hypo breeding can really only be used to prove the possible is NOT a super. AKA if any babies appear normal, then the possible cannot be a super. IMO the reverse (all babies are hypos) does not necessarily prove the possible is a super. IF it's a good size litter AND there are only hypo bbaies, then it's a good probability your possible really is a super but not proven.
I know what you mean about wanting to know. and may have to do smoe trilas to prove mine out as well. In addition to smo e possible super hypos, I have 2.2 ghosts all possible supers. All from different sources. Would be nice to know which are super and which are not. ie super ghost to super ghost = litter of super ghost babies. Gotta be more valuable and more marketable then possibles. But if you don't know for certain both parent are supers then.....
-----
Thanks,
Dave Colling
www.rainbows-r-us-reptiles.com
0.1 Wife (WC and still very fiesty)
0.2 kids (CBB, a big part of our selective breeding program)
LOL, to many snakes to list, last count:
21.29 BRB
19.19 BCI
And those are only the breeders 
lots.lots.lots feeder mice and rats  
[ Hide Replies ]
|
RE: Probables and supers?? - rainbowsrus, Thu Jun 7 10:45:02 2007