LOL, saw that, stumbled over it, figured wht you meant and went on.

A possible super to a hypo breeding can really only be used to prove the possible is NOT a super. AKA if any babies appear normal, then the possible cannot be a super. IMO the reverse (all babies are hypos) does not necessarily prove the possible is a super. IF it's a good size litter AND there are only hypo bbaies, then it's a good probability your possible really is a super but not proven.

I know what you mean about wanting to know. and may have to do smoe trilas to prove mine out as well. In addition to smo e possible super hypos, I have 2.2 ghosts all possible supers. All from different sources. Would be nice to know which are super and which are not. ie super ghost to super ghost = litter of super ghost babies. Gotta be more valuable and more marketable then possibles. But if you don't know for certain both parent are supers then.....
-----
Thanks,


Dave Colling

www.rainbows-r-us-reptiles.com



0.1 Wife (WC and still very fiesty)
0.2 kids (CBB, a big part of our selective breeding program)

LOL, to many snakes to list, last count:
21.29 BRB
19.19 BCI
And those are only the breeders

lots.lots.lots feeder mice and rats

[ Hide Replies ]

• Probables and supers?? - zerickone, Thu Jun 7 02:31:36 2007
• RE: Probables and supers?? - liquid-leaf, Thu Jun 7 05:39:51 2007
• RE: Probables and supers?? - liquid-leaf, Thu Jun 7 05:41:28 2007
• RE: Probables and supers?? - rainbowsrus, Thu Jun 7 10:45:02 2007
• RE: Probables and supers?? - zerickone, Thu Jun 7 11:18:32 2007
• Holy Smokes Andrew.... - ajfreptiles, Thu Jun 7 14:01:39 2007
• RE: Probables and supers?? - Paul Hollander, Thu Jun 7 11:57:10 2007
• RE: Probables and supers?? - iamsnakeshack, Thu Jun 7 12:10:42 2007
• RE: Probables and supers?? - Rick Staub, Thu Jun 7 19:57:28 2007