Not to bust on anyone but I'm pretty sure the post above is wrong on the combo leucistics. This is all very new and open to debate but I believe the disputed outcome would be as follows:

lucy (lesser X mojave) X normal = 50% lesser, 50% mojave
lucy (lesser X phantom) X normal = 50% lesser, 50% phantom
lucy (lesser X mojave) X normal = 50% lesser, 50% mojave
lucy (Vin Russo X mojave) X normal = 50% Vin Russo, 50% mojave
lucy (butter X mojave) X normal = 50% butter, 50% mojave
lucy (butter X lesser) X normal = 50% butter, 50% lesser

[ Hide Replies ]

• lucy genetics - bamsonly1, Sun Jul 1 14:08:25 2007
• RE: lucy genetics - nintendo78, Tue Jul 3 09:31:43 2007
• RE: lucy genetics - RandyRemington, Wed Jul 4 08:59:01 2007
• NOW THAT IS A *BREAKDOWN* - REPTILE4U, Thu Jul 12 15:21:36 2007
• RE: NOW THAT IS A *BREAKDOWN* - RandyRemington, Tue Jul 17 17:22:28 2007
• Agreed Randy... - MAHLON, Wed Jul 25 18:09:12 2007
• RE: NOW THAT IS A *BREAKDOWN* - nephrurus, Thu Dec 27 13:06:18 2007