Doesn't this contradict everything that the punntet squares prove? Doesn't the punnet square say that 25% of the babies will be the visual, not each baby will have a 25% to be the visual. I guess i'm just a little confused then. It was my understanding that 25% would be visual, 50% would be het, and 25% would be regular therefore making the babies 2/3 or around 67% het for the gene because you cant possibly know which animals would actually carry the genes because most hets and normals look a like.

[ Show Entire Thread ]