While habitat degradation/destruction is definitely the major factor in the decline of native species (as well as the spread of invasives), what does complaining about it going to do to help prevent the further devastation caused by this particular species (Varanus niloticus) in Florida?

I think we can all agree that much of Florida's natural habitats have been altered by man. Many native species appear to be doing fine in anthropogenically-altered habitats, as well as in the few remaining primary habitats.

If you do not condone capturing these lizards in an effort to help limit/end their devastating effects on native wildlife, what alternative do you offer?

I do not see the government sanctioning the bulldozing of people's homes and businesses in an effort to reclaim natural habitat. The damage has been done in thes circumstances.

They can make an effort to prevent further development and habitat degradation, but what about the areas that are already developed, and already affected/threatened by V. niloticus? Trapping is a partial solution to solving this problem.

You can criticize biologists, ecologists, and conservationists all you would like, however sitting behind your computer screen complaining about a potential solution while offering nothing in exchange does not add much clout to your arguments.

Please share with us how you would go about irradicating this invasive, devastating species from suburban and industrial environments- one of the many areas which V. niloticus seem to be fond of inhabiting, keeping in mind that they are just as comfortable in undisturbed environments as well. How will protecting "natural habitat" end the effects of the monitors in these environments?

Are you advocating the Florida FWS to just 'forget about' the V. niloticus that have colonized southwestern Florida? Are they to just give up on their efforts to irradicate them? Is all lost?

Certainly not.

[ Show Entire Thread ]