After reading your earlier post which I believe my reply sparked this whole hijacking (not that I mind as I love genetics talk) I had originally thought you did not understand the genetics behind the two inheritances and attempted to increase your familiarity with them.
However after reading your most recent post I believe that you do in fact understand the workings of the genetics behind these animals. On the same note, I believe that your original post could be read by others and lead to a misinterpretation of the genetic workings. I appologize if I sounded rude or anything similar, I did not mean it that way. It just makes my skin crawl when I hear someone selling a possible dominant or co-dominant hypo when they actually mean a possible homozygous or heterozygous hypo. Almost as much as the guy at the show that tried to sell me a het arabesque that was obviously a normal sibling as the trait is not recessive. Sorry I am off topic, just wanted to apologize.
-----
- Jason F.

[ Show Entire Thread ]