Posted by:
shannon brown
at Tue Oct 9 11:00:37 2007 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by shannon brown ]
Gerrit,
Like I have said to you many times "its to late" you can't change the world .LOL....
Also, nobody ever claimed them to be locale specific amels.
Even the anerys that were first produced were clearly not locale and were more than likely stuarti x hondurensis.
The first hypos produced were from a pet store snake labled coral snake so we have no idea of its origin.
I think the term Honduran is actually just a hobby term anyway.Show me just a wild type locale specific hondurensis? I think that there range is very small and there intergradation range is huge with several other subs.
I doubt that there pure range was ever even collected.Just because itsimported from Honduras doesn't make it a hondurensis but in the importers eyes its a honduran milk.
Also, look at Shores's amel splendida line.The amel was wild collected in southwest N.M and is clearly a intergrade (more splendida but still a intergrade) with cal king.
Its just a hobby term unless a locale is placed in front of it.
Shannon
[ Hide Replies ]
|
RE: Here we go... - shannon brown, Tue Oct 9 11:00:37 2007