Posted by:
patoquack
at Sat Oct 13 10:58:34 2007 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by patoquack ]
I understand that a hypo can be a "het"
"Hh" is a hypo, but "HH" is also a hypo (superhypo).
therefore, not all hypos are hets. some hypos are homozygous for the hypo trait (I am pretty much 100% sure about this - but please tell me if you think I am wrong..)
- so why assume that all hypos het for albino can be called "double het?? but of course you may not be assuming that.. and of course I may be wrong again..(I know that's possible!)
Patrick
[ Hide Replies ]
|