There no such thing as a:

non-dominant hypo is "Hh"
a dominant or Super hypo is "HH"
. . . . so a non-dominant hypo ("Hh" is het for Super hypo?

There are homozygous hypos (called super hypos) and heterozygous hypos (called hets). There are no such things as a dominant or non-dominant hypo. That is not a description of a type of a hypo at all, it a description of how the genetics works. This has been pointed out to you many times now. I suggest you take it on faith for now and stop using those incorrect terms so as not to continue confusing more people. I am sure if you keep rereading the answers here over and over you'll get it. But you need to go read them all again and again.
-----
Caden Chapman
slithering.serpents@gmail.com
http://slitheringserpents.com

[ Hide Replies ]

• OK, so help the dumb boa guy.. please. - patoquack, Fri Oct 12 21:51:52 2007
• this was a reply to the post below.. np - patoquack, Fri Oct 12 21:57:52 2007
• RE: OK, so help the dumb boa guy.. please. - Slithering_Serpents, Sat Oct 13 16:06:14 2007
• please don't scold me. - patoquack, Wed Oct 17 00:28:05 2007
• The source of the confusion is this: - boaphile, Sat Oct 13 20:24:02 2007