The point is, you mentioned they are from out of our country. Then that means, you will need to bring them in with export permits from CR. If our fine government accepts that, then your finer that frog hair. But if for whatever reason, our government says no. Then you will have to find some in the states already. Simple and end of story.

What Mcota is taking about has nothing to do with that.

As you know, our government does not have to abide by CITES, it only has to use their regs as a minimum. So they can indeed deny their import, for any reason they choose. Thats up to them. Again, they will do what they do, all without Mcotas comments.

If Mcota is saying what your doing is illegal, which means it could be interpided as slander. Which is illegal as well. If he "knows"(can prove) those animals are illegal, then hes telling the truth, but until he can prove their were poached, he has not grounds to slander anyone. At this point, he is assuming they came from Thailand. And you know what that does. hahahahahahahahahaha

I am familiar with this as many said the same thing about my lacies or any ozzie monitors. But the truth and law is very different from those assumptions.

In this case, you are talking about doing something in a legal way, your not poaching them or paying someone to poach them. Your intending to import them in a legal way. So I see no reason for Mcota to say anything. The system is in place and your using the system.

I will say, good luck, I hope it goes smoothly. Cheers

[ Hide Replies ]

• Black Water Monitor - Sighthunter, Sun Oct 21 21:05:28 2007
• RE: Black Water Monitor - mrcota, Mon Oct 22 01:32:09 2007
• RE: So how come - FR, Mon Oct 22 09:20:06 2007
• This is why - mrcota, Tue Oct 23 02:36:23 2007
• RE: This is why - FR, Tue Oct 23 09:42:04 2007
• RE: This is why - Sighthunter, Tue Oct 23 12:06:13 2007
• RE: This is why - FR, Tue Oct 23 13:14:21 2007
• I must have missed the slander... - qiksilver5, Tue Oct 23 16:07:31 2007
• RE: No it was not slander, yet - FR, Tue Oct 23 16:55:29 2007
• RE: No it was not slander, yet - Sighthunter, Tue Oct 23 18:19:49 2007
• RE: This is why - wstreps, Tue Oct 23 18:19:57 2007
• RE: This is why - FR, Tue Oct 23 20:01:38 2007
• RE: This is why - Sighthunter, Tue Oct 23 21:31:59 2007
• RE: This is why - mrcota, Thu Oct 25 04:41:07 2007
• RE: This is why - wstreps, Thu Oct 25 08:41:51 2007
• RE: This is why - mrcota, Thu Oct 25 10:08:40 2007
• RE: This is why - FR, Thu Oct 25 10:59:31 2007
• RE: This is why - wstreps, Thu Oct 25 15:00:00 2007
• RE: This is why - FR, Thu Oct 25 19:13:10 2007
• Maybe the problem is a Thai issue. - SHvar, Fri Oct 26 11:33:19 2007
• RE: Maybe the problem is a Thai issue. - FR, Fri Oct 26 18:00:59 2007
• How about this.. - SHvar, Sat Oct 27 11:25:26 2007
• FR, you know.. - SHvar, Sun Oct 28 11:14:29 2007
• RE: This is why - monitormanUK, Fri Oct 26 06:23:14 2007
• RE: This is why - MadAxeMan, Fri Oct 26 07:54:41 2007
• RE: This is why - FR, Fri Oct 26 10:46:06 2007
• The problems with laws. - SHvar, Tue Oct 23 22:27:34 2007
• Bribe? - Sighthunter, Wed Oct 24 01:01:24 2007
• A link - Sighthunter, Wed Oct 24 11:34:13 2007
• RE: A link - MikesMonitors, Wed Oct 24 12:18:49 2007
• Dibbs!!! - woodsrider, Mon Oct 22 09:48:55 2007
• RE: Dibbs!!! - Sighthunter, Tue Oct 23 12:56:58 2007
• RE: Dibbs!!! - woodsrider, Tue Oct 23 15:28:45 2007
• RE: Dibbs!!! - Sighthunter, Tue Oct 23 18:08:36 2007