![]() | mobile - desktop |
|
![]() |
![]() Available Now at RodentPro.com! |
News & Events:
|
[ Login ] [ User Prefs ] [ Search Forums ] [ Back to Main Page ] [ Back to Boa Forum ] |
Posted by: NUCCIZ_BOAS at Mon Nov 5 00:09:30 2007 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by NUCCIZ_BOAS ] I know these are all rough estimates based on theory, and it never works out the same as on paper. I was just trying to confirm that odds are more along the lines of getting a 1 in 8 sunglow arabesque as opposed to what I was told being a 1 in 16 snake. I don't think breeding trials ever work out perfectly with the percentages, I just wanted to teach myself how to put a multiple gene punnet square down on paper in front of me, not just try to come up with it in my head. But from what I'm being told, my work on paper came out right. It was actually really complicated. The only example I had to work off of in the book was a double recessive x double recessive, which through me off because neither of my snakes are double recessive. If you dont mind, I don't understand why you said you would put the arabesque as RrAaHH? I dont see where the HH comes in to play or what difference it would have made? | ||
>> Next Message: RE: Genetics experts' input needed (long - Paul Hollander, Mon Nov 5 19:05:59 2007 | ||
<< Previous Message: RE: Genetics experts' input needed (long) - hiss_n_herps, Sun Nov 4 23:52:29 2007 |
AprilFirstBioEngineering | GunHobbyist.com | GunShowGuide.com | GunShows.mobi | GunBusinessGuide.com | club kingsnake | live stage magazine
|