LOL, you are right, 1/256 is correct, I did it in my head and ya know how that goes, almost as well as my typing skills!!!


-----
Thanks,


Dave Colling

www.rainbows-r-us-reptiles.com



0.1 Wife (WC and still very fiesty)
0.2 kids (CBB, a big part of our selective breeding program)

LOL, to many snakes to list, last count:
24.36 BRB
19.19 BCI
And those are only the breeders

lots.lots.lots feeder mice and rats

[ Hide Replies ]

• Genetics experts' input needed (long) - NUCCIZ_BOAS, Sun Nov 4 22:59:18 2007
• RE: Genetics experts' input needed (long) - JackJebus, Sun Nov 4 23:16:09 2007
• RE: Genetics experts' input needed (long) - hiss_n_herps, Sun Nov 4 23:52:29 2007
• RE: Genetics experts' input needed (long - NUCCIZ_BOAS, Mon Nov 5 00:09:30 2007
• RE: Genetics experts' input needed (long - Paul Hollander, Mon Nov 5 19:05:59 2007
• Paul! - NUCCIZ_BOAS, Mon Nov 5 22:05:41 2007
• RE: Paul! - rainbowsrus, Tue Nov 6 02:57:59 2007
• Wrong symbols -- Sorry - Paul Hollander, Tue Nov 6 12:09:28 2007
• A couple things.... - jhsulliv, Mon Nov 5 06:42:58 2007
• One point of dissention...... - rainbowsrus, Mon Nov 5 12:14:52 2007
• RE: One point of dissention...... - jhsulliv, Mon Nov 5 13:02:16 2007
• RE: One point of dissention...... - rainbowsrus, Mon Nov 5 13:53:51 2007
• IMO, an easier method than punnet square - rainbowsrus, Mon Nov 5 12:36:10 2007
• Excellent explanation Dave! - kblumenthal, Mon Nov 5 13:19:17 2007
• RE: Excellent explanation Dave! - rainbowsrus, Mon Nov 5 13:48:30 2007
• RE: Excellent explanation Dave! - kblumenthal, Mon Nov 5 14:42:56 2007
• RE: Excellent explanation Dave! - rainbowsrus, Mon Nov 5 15:05:46 2007
• RE: IMO, an easier method than punnet square - jscrick, Mon Nov 5 13:32:42 2007
• RE: IMO, an easier method than punnet square - rainbowsrus, Mon Nov 5 13:46:34 2007