WW's preceding message seems to be a tacit admission that Fry and himself have got it wrong and that they may now be planning to amnd their more sensational claims in one or more forthcoming papers.
It's just a pity that they have to repair the damage they have already caused, if in fact they eventually ever get around to it after the current fracas dies down.

[ Hide Replies ]

• Is BGF The new Clifford Warwick? - rayhoser, Sat Aug 23 19:16:41 2003
• RE: Is BGF The new Clifford Warwick? - Trust, Sat Aug 23 21:30:05 2003
• Who's Clifford Warwick? - paalexan, Sat Aug 23 22:35:46 2003
• RE: Who's Clifford Warwick? - WW, Sun Aug 24 02:09:06 2003
• Dollars and dollars - rayhoser, Sun Aug 24 19:16:55 2003
• RE: Dollars and dollars - BGF, Sun Aug 24 20:16:27 2003
• RE: Who's Clifford Warwick? - Phillip, Sun Aug 24 20:03:27 2003
• RE: Who's Clifford Warwick? - BGF, Sun Aug 24 20:14:56 2003
• True colours - BGF's own words - rayhoser, Sun Aug 24 22:15:02 2003
• RE: True colours - BGF's own words - BGF, Sun Aug 24 23:16:31 2003
• RE: True colours - BGF's own words - M5, Mon Aug 25 00:31:40 2003
• RE: True colours - BGF's own words - BGF, Mon Aug 25 07:16:13 2003
• RE: True colours - BGF's own words - M5, Mon Aug 25 08:06:36 2003
• RE: True colours - BGF's own words - WW, Mon Aug 25 09:08:51 2003
• RE: Who's Clifford Warwick? - WW, Mon Aug 25 00:56:01 2003
• A more reasonable interpretation - rayhoser, Mon Aug 25 03:36:55 2003
• RE: A more reasonable interpretation - BGF, Mon Aug 25 07:17:21 2003
• RE: A well known fact - Ferdelance_1, Mon Aug 25 16:45:46 2003
• RE: Who's Clifford Warwick? - paalexan, Mon Aug 25 16:44:11 2003
• RE: Is BGF The new Clifford Warwick? - Rick gordon, Mon Aug 25 12:22:38 2003
• RE: Is BGF The new Clifford Warwick? - rearfang, Tue Aug 26 19:06:44 2003