![]() | market - home |
![]() |
![]() |
News & Events:
|
| [ Login ] [ User Prefs ] [ Search Forums ] [ Back to Main Page ] [ Back to Boa Forum ] |
Posted by: BoidaeAddiction at Sun Nov 18 16:59:28 2007 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by BoidaeAddiction ] I would refer to the bloodline as a percentage. If the sunglow came directly from the burkes and is a lipstick line, I would call the offspring 50% lipstick line. If the sunglow was a 50% I would call the offspring 25 % lipstick line, and so one. That is how I would do it since it is a bloodline, that way the strength or residuals of that bloodline can be quantified by a percentage. But then it gets tricky because the bloodlines attributes may be stronger in some animals and not present in others regardless of the % of bloodline. This is the same problem faced with the harlequin bloodline. If it becomes extremely dilute and the visible traits aren't their, can you still call it a harlequin. At least it can be validated by a percentage so others can prove lineage to a bloodline later on. Sorry for being so long winded. Regardless of all this, if they are coral, you can sell them as such anyway but I would hold on to the bloodline since it has been established. Trey | ||
<< Previous Message: What should I call these SUNGLOWS?? - Shane Kinney, Sun Nov 18 16:12:03 2007 | ||
|
|
|
|