![]() | mobile - desktop |
![]() |
![]() |
News & Events:
|
| [ Login ] [ User Prefs ] [ Search Forums ] [ Back to Main Page ] [ Back to Boa Forum ] |
Posted by: BoidaeAddiction at Sun Nov 18 17:51:09 2007 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by BoidaeAddiction ] I agree that they shouldn't be called pastels, and no one would disagree with calling animals red or high constrast if it is obvious. However, few people can trace back their "coral" animals to Pete Kahl's original coral litters. Corals just happen to pop up all the time regardless of whether or not they are related to existing coral lines. Also, there is no "lipstick gene", it is simply a bloodline that has a wide range of color results and to avoid calling other animals in the future lipstick in the same way we throw around the term corals, the bloodline should be kept in tact by refering to their direct lineage to the burke's lipstick animals or else the point of a bloodline is useless. | ||
>> Next Message: RE: What should I call these SUNGLOWS?? - Slithering_Serpents, Sun Nov 18 18:05:24 2007 >> Next Message: It seems to be... - reinert, Sun Nov 18 20:42:42 2007 | ||
<< Previous Message: RE: What should I call these SUNGLOWS?? - Slithering_Serpents, Sun Nov 18 17:24:10 2007 | ||
|
|
|
|