Posted by:
Slithering_Serpents
at Sun Nov 18 18:05:24 2007 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by Slithering_Serpents ]
I didn't say corals should be traced back to Pete Kahl. But there's a problem with everyone deciding for themselves what is and what is not a coral. Lots of people sell snakes that are "corals" that haven't even developed their color yet. Some of those snakes will never develop the coral colorations. It takes the meaning out of what corals are, and reduces them to something subjective.
I didn't mean the "lipstick gene" literally either, I just meant the traits that allowed the Burke's to develop the strain. Every person isn't really qualified to say what is and isn't a "lipstick" sunglow. ----- Caden Chapman
slithering.serpents@gmail.com
http://slitheringserpents.com
[ Hide Replies ]
|