Posted by:
paalexan
at Thu Sep 4 18:52:03 2003 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by paalexan ]
Well, I was going by what I've heard, which could, of course, be incorrect. What little I've seen of them suggests, though, that your descriptions of new species were pretty weak, and, whatever your intentions may have been, this does have the result of allowing you to name large numbers of species, while leaving the work of validating them to others. That, of itself, is a pretty big mistake and also the biggest problem with Hoser's work, IMO.
I'm curious, though, as to why you might have been motivated to revenge yourself against the Australian Museum, and why there would be this much rancor against you.
Patrick Alexander
[ Show Entire Thread ]
|
