Posted by:
Jeff Schofield
at Tue Jan 8 22:42:28 2008 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by Jeff Schofield ]
I am real good at the math and the science but I dont have all the fun morphs to play with,lol. If my theory is correct about 1/3 of the "EXTREMES"(as defined prior to my theory)are actually EXTREMES as defined after my theory--with 2/3 of them being EXTREME HYPO. I have since refigured my theory a bit...
To prove it we can take the BEST,clearest, "MOST EXTREME" per say figuring that it would HAVE to be a EXTREME HYPO. Bred to a "normal" type (or for that matter an ANERY not het HYPO, The resulting offspring should be hets(1 gene),dbl hets(2 genes) or triple hets(3 genes--3rd being anery). These f2s when recrossed would produce EXPONENTIALLY more MORPHS than what would be expected....Instead of 25% with hets you would get 75% with double hets. and I think its 87.5% with triple hets. Problem is that is figuring f3....Wish I could go back now and erase some of these posts, feel pretty stupid to be the only one following,lol,thanks,Jeff
[ Hide Replies ]
|