Posted by:
shannon brown
at Wed Jan 9 12:35:49 2008 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by shannon brown ]
so, the way I see it is like this.
you take a extreme hypo (as we know them) and breed it to a totally known normal. Take a couple of those offspring and breed them together (not back to dad) and you should see three types?correct?
wild type (possible dbl-hets) extreme's (non hypo or lav or whatever) and extreme hypo's?
we would have already seen this but I think if this holds true the problem is that were do you draw a line between a non hypo extreme vs. a hypo extreme? clearly they are both out there already if this theory holds water.
I really don't think you can go by tipping either. I have some with tipping (mostly the Terry's line)and I think its just part of life and chalk it up to variability.
But, I also believe that terry's line and falcon's lines are different.I really think that if there is a lavender gene it is in Terry's and not Mikes line.Lavender wouldn't reduce tipping and Terry's line still has allot of tipping (although atractive).
L8r Shannon
[ Hide Replies ]
|
splitting hairs.... - shannon brown, Wed Jan 9 12:35:49 2008 