so, the way I see it is like this.

you take a extreme hypo (as we know them) and breed it to a totally known normal. Take a couple of those offspring and breed them together (not back to dad) and you should see three types?correct?

wild type (possible dbl-hets) extreme's (non hypo or lav or whatever) and extreme hypo's?

we would have already seen this but I think if this holds true the problem is that were do you draw a line between a non hypo extreme vs. a hypo extreme? clearly they are both out there already if this theory holds water.



I really don't think you can go by tipping either. I have some with tipping (mostly the Terry's line)and I think its just part of life and chalk it up to variability.

But, I also believe that terry's line and falcon's lines are different.I really think that if there is a lavender gene it is in Terry's and not Mikes line.Lavender wouldn't reduce tipping and Terry's line still has allot of tipping (although atractive).



L8r Shannon

[ Show Entire Thread ]