So it is fair to say, since both parents of each "strain" were not collected from the same locality that these are not locality animals. I am still curious as to what locality "mates"?) were used in conjunction with the "strain" locality animals(Kansas, S.Texas, Amarillo) to produce these offspring, although at this point it's not that important. That is all I wanted to know. I never stated I was unhappy with the snakes and also stated that I simply wanted to represent the snakes as what they are. I will now represent them as generic. Contrary to what you think you recall, you NEVER represented those animals as "strains". I truly thought I was buying locale animals. Again I am not dissappointed with the bulls. It was the representation I was unsatisfied with. I will keep them for now, but if I decide to let them go, I wanted to represent them as what they are. I think anyone would expect that and deserve that type of honesty. Wouldn't you agree?

With regard to your statement about the correspondence issue, I have in fact e-mailed you several times upon obtaining the bulls you sent. I e-mailed you two days ago pleading for a response in one last final ditch effort and you ignored it. The fact that other people have been able to contact you is irrelevant here. I never said I couldn't contact you, I said you wouldn't contact me once the transaction was over. You never made any attempt to contact me. I find it amusing that you would now offer to take these snakes back after all this time. Of course if I did have a problem with the snakes, would it have mattered? You wouldn't even respond to a few simple questions after all this time. I am sorry that it had to come to me posting here before you would finally answer my questions. I do appreciate the information. Thank you! Take care.

[ Show Entire Thread ]