Exactly. In fact, the question I e-mailed to the moderators of the

recent KS chat (a question that was never asked) was, "What burden of proof, if any, does the Lacey Act/USFWS require to take action (which uses our tax money?)"



Hopefully our judicial system won't take this route. Anyone accused of a crime will have to prove they DIDN'T commit the crime.



Thanks,

Ed









>>First and foremost, there should be proof of a problem before making a law to confront it, not proof of a lack of the problem.

[ Hide Replies ]

• You Need Experimental Data! - marcp, Fri Mar 7 20:30:35 2008
• RE: You Need Experimental Data! - OHI, Sat Mar 8 00:51:50 2008
• You don't need to do an experiment - MadAxeMan, Sat Mar 8 07:32:53 2008
• RE: You don't need to do an experiment - marcp, Sat Mar 8 08:12:58 2008
• RE: You don't need to do an experiment - natsamjosh, Sat Mar 8 09:00:24 2008
• RE: You don't need to do an experiment - marcp, Sat Mar 8 20:24:51 2008
• RE: You don't need to do an experiment - wstreps, Sun Mar 9 09:30:26 2008
• Can we organize better? - marcp, Sun Mar 9 11:01:12 2008
• RE: You don't need to do an experiment - lbenton, Tue Mar 11 13:29:12 2008
• This is NOT about science! - natsamjosh, Sat Mar 8 08:04:13 2008
• RE: This is NOT about science! - silentchaos, Sat Mar 8 14:31:47 2008
• RE: This is NOT about science! - natsamjosh, Mon Mar 10 08:37:30 2008
• RE: You Need Experimental Data! - lbenton, Tue Mar 11 13:38:37 2008