Again, it probably means nothing, but just thought I'd share this

with the forum. I'll give this Rep. some credit, the other two bill sponsors didn't respond at all. (Start from bottom for initial message.)



I'm starting to think the Animal Rights extremists might be going

too far for their own good (ie, ridiculous 100 year global warming maps, trying to ban anything with scales or feathers, etc.), which is good for us.



Thanks,

Ed



-----------------------------------------------------------

---- Sara Lampe wrote:

In order for a bill to progress, it must be assigned to a committee and have a hearing held. The sponsor of the legislation has not requested the bill to be assigned to committee.



-----My message:

Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 11:53 AM

To: Sara Lampe

Subject: RE: House Bill 1847



Thank you for your prompt response. But if there are errors in the legislation, why would it even have a chance at passing? Why isn't it being repealed or rescinded (or whatever the term is for cancelling a bill?)



Thank you,

Ed





---- Sara Lampe wrote:

Dear Edward,



Representative Sara Lampe is aware of the errors in this legislation and does not expect it to progress through the legislative process.

[ Hide Replies ]

• Another response from MO Congresslady - natsamjosh, Wed Mar 19 12:11:50 2008
• RE: Another response from MO Congresslad - rhodostom, Wed Mar 19 12:19:01 2008