Just remembered something.....

The babies that I said were sharp sunglows 50% het would not be the paraglow. The paraglow would be the sharp sunglow that is het. in essence, you could tell apart the boas that are het for BW Hypo from the ones that are not because the way the gene interacts with Sharp Strain albino makes them visually different.

But my arguement is this, the paraglow is a Sharp sunglow het for BW Hypo. No where in any of Mikes breedings was a t-positive boa ever thrown into the mix, so how can it be assumed that this is a t-positive sunglow? Mike is claiming that the mixture of BW Hypo/Sharp strain albino is a t-positive, which is not true because like I said, T-positive is a gene all of its own which works as a simple recessive.

[ Hide Replies ]

• Paradigm/Paraglow Question...... LONG - NUCCIZ_BOAS, Sat Jul 19 21:47:34 2008
• RE: Paradigm/Paraglow Question...... LONG - bigjoe4747, Sat Jul 19 21:59:49 2008
• exactly my point..... n/p - NUCCIZ_BOAS, Sat Jul 19 22:03:06 2008
• RE: sorry i was wrong - bigjoe4747, Sat Jul 19 22:04:22 2008
• AHHHHHHHHHH - NUCCIZ_BOAS, Sat Jul 19 22:12:46 2008
• Correction - NUCCIZ_BOAS, Sat Jul 19 22:02:16 2008
• You sound lost - chris nicholas, Sat Jul 19 23:24:30 2008
• RE: You sound lost - Guy Scavone II, Sat Jul 19 23:34:41 2008
• Im Still Lost....... - NUCCIZ_BOAS, Sun Jul 20 00:13:21 2008
• so does this mean...... - NUCCIZ_BOAS, Sun Jul 20 00:21:18 2008
• Yes. - chris nicholas, Sun Jul 20 07:29:48 2008
• This should help you..... - BoaMorph, Sun Jul 20 11:41:26 2008
• RE: This should help you..... - LarM, Sun Jul 20 12:34:44 2008
• RE: Paradigm/Paraglow Question...... LONG - mdc, Sun Jul 20 14:25:30 2008