Posted by:
NUCCIZ_BOAS
at Mon Jul 28 14:53:36 2008 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by NUCCIZ_BOAS ]
I think everybody is in agreement that this throws a really weird twist into the hypo motley genetics.
I'm not sure I like the idea that breeding a Hypo Motley het albino x Sunglow will NOT produce a super sunglow motley. (homozygous hypo/Heterozygous Motley)
If Im understanding this right, that breeding would produce -Sunglow motleys -Albino motleys -Super Sunglows as well as normal sunglows -Albinos -Hypo Motleys 100% het (without producing a super hypo motley) -Motleys 100% het -DH Sunglows
Yet as I mentioned, leaving out super sunglow motleys and super hypo motleys. Only way to get those, as it seems, would be hypo motley x hypo motley, or of course sunglow motley x hypo motley.
Kind of sucks, I really would have liked to have seen the homozygous hypo form of a sunglow motley. I think that would have been wacky, especially after seeing the super sunglow arabesques by Pete Kahl a few years ago, from breeding a sunglow arabesque x Lipstick DH. The homozygous hypo really did a number on the pattern of the sunglow arabesque. Gave it a spotted look instead of the traditional arabesque pattern. I think it really could have done wonders to the motley pattern
Wow, what a twist in the genetics world, I think so anyways
[ Show Entire Thread ]
|