Posted by:
	      NUCCIZ_BOAS
	      at Mon Jul 28 14:53:36 2008  	[ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by NUCCIZ_BOAS ]  
 I think everybody is in agreement that this throws a really weird twist into the hypo motley genetics.  
  I'm not sure I like the idea that breeding a Hypo Motley het albino x Sunglow will NOT produce a super sunglow motley.  (homozygous hypo/Heterozygous Motley)  
  If Im understanding this right, that breeding would produce -Sunglow motleys -Albino motleys -Super Sunglows as well as normal sunglows -Albinos -Hypo Motleys 100% het (without producing a super hypo motley) -Motleys 100% het -DH Sunglows
  Yet as I mentioned, leaving out super sunglow motleys and super hypo motleys.  Only way to get those, as it seems, would be hypo motley x hypo motley, or of course sunglow motley x hypo motley.
  Kind of sucks, I really would have liked to have seen the homozygous hypo form of a sunglow motley.  I think that would have been wacky, especially after seeing the super sunglow arabesques by Pete Kahl a few years ago, from breeding a sunglow arabesque x Lipstick DH.  The homozygous hypo really did a number on the pattern of the sunglow arabesque.  Gave it a spotted look instead of the traditional arabesque pattern.  I think it really could have done wonders to the motley pattern
  Wow, what a twist in the genetics world, I think so anyways  
 [ Show Entire Thread ] 
 |