I think you're doind a disservice by saying reduced patterns are just "pretty normals". By that measure, isn't a lucy, pied, or anything else just a pretty normal? I have a proven line of simple recessive GENETIC reduced patterns...They have very obvious characteristic. No, they are not as dramatic as those others, but they are a distinct morph none the less. The original posters, however, is not one...

[ Hide Replies ]

• reduced pattern or pretty normal? - luvmyhydra, Sun Aug 17 21:08:27 2008
• RE: reduced pattern or pretty normal? - NoahHart, Sun Aug 17 21:12:50 2008
• RE: reduced pattern or pretty normal? - toshamc, Sun Aug 17 21:46:19 2008
• RE: reduced pattern or pretty normal? - luvmyhydra, Sun Aug 17 21:49:30 2008
• RE: reduced pattern or pretty normal? - NoahHart, Sun Aug 17 22:05:38 2008
• RE: reduced pattern or pretty normal? - mweippert, Mon Aug 18 00:05:24 2008
• RE: reduced pattern or pretty normal? - luvmyhydra, Mon Aug 18 00:07:52 2008
• RE: reduced pattern or pretty normal? - chfd143, Mon Aug 18 00:10:34 2008
• RE: reduced pattern or pretty normal? - luvmyhydra, Mon Aug 18 00:36:12 2008
• RE: reduced pattern or pretty normal? - PHLdyPayne, Mon Aug 18 10:33:42 2008
• RE: reduced pattern or pretty normal? - melindaste, Mon Aug 18 07:01:53 2008
• RE: reduced pattern or pretty normal? - luvmyhydra, Mon Aug 18 10:24:20 2008
• Excuse me??? - JP, Mon Aug 18 18:33:33 2008
• some pics.... - JP, Mon Aug 18 18:39:26 2008