 | mobile - desktop |
|
 |
 Available Now at RodentPro.com! |
| mobile - desktop |
|
|
Available Now at RodentPro.com! |
News & Events:
|
| [ Login ] [ User Prefs ] [ Search Forums ] [ Back to Main Page ] [ Back to Ball Pythons ] |
Posted by: toshamc at Mon Aug 18 12:23:28 2008 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by toshamc ] There was an argument some time back somewhere around the time the ivory came out -- that a YB couldn't be called a YB (aka het ivory) unless it came from a proven ivory line. There were those that argued a YB is a YB and all will produce the ivory -- and those that insisted that only a proven YB line could be called a YB -- yes there are thousands of imported YBs every year -- will they all prove out -- who knows. And there in lies the distinction -- some lines have been proven out others are still "unproven". [ Hide Replies ]
| ||
>> Next topic: "Lithium"-- NOT the medication... - kinderman, Mon Aug 18 13:28:19 2008 << Previous topic: Pinave?? - dacherrypicker, Mon Aug 18 10:45:31 2008 | ||
|
AprilFirstBioEngineering | GunHobbyist.com | GunShowGuide.com | GunShows.mobi | GunBusinessGuide.com | club kingsnake | live stage magazine
| ||||||||
RE: Question about Lineage of Yellow Bel - toshamc, Mon Aug 18 12:23:28 2008
