Posted by:
robertmcphee
at Wed Oct 8 00:38:10 2008 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by robertmcphee ]
In the case of Super Jungles:
The outcome of the litter was not what was expected.....
It is my guess (definitely just a guess) that litters produced from Super Jungles did not prove out (IE) normals were present. This would blow the whole jungle morph out of the water.
I don't think that there would be any reason for the super jungles to be infertile, but it could be that the morph has been drastically misunderstood.
In working with the Cyclones I have come under intense scrutiny from pretty much everyone in the online world, I was told that it could take about 10 years to "prove" out what was going on!
I accept that, but what I don't understand is how did the jungles blow up so fast, and why did everyone assume that they knew how the gene was working?
Is it possible that Jungles are also just another polymorphic genome???
-----
Robert McPhee
www.BBCExotics.com
[ Hide Replies ]
- Supers Infertile? - SpectreBCIs, Tue Oct 7 10:44:55 2008
- RE: Supers Infertile? - Morgans Boas, Tue Oct 7 11:06:02 2008
- RE: Supers Infertile? - LSD, Tue Oct 7 11:19:30 2008
- RE: Supers Infertile? - BrownsBoas, Tue Oct 7 12:35:42 2008
- RE: Supers Infertile? - xXVanXx, Tue Oct 7 13:11:47 2008
- RE: Supers Infertile? - Shane Kinney, Tue Oct 7 14:19:40 2008
- RE: Supers Infertile? - kirby, Tue Oct 7 14:32:49 2008
- RE: Supers Infertile? - BrownsBoas, Tue Oct 7 15:03:35 2008
- RE: Supers Infertile? - SpectreBCIs, Tue Oct 7 18:16:43 2008
- RE: Supers Infertile? - Morgans Boas, Tue Oct 7 19:08:24 2008
 Could it be.... - robertmcphee, Wed Oct 8 00:38:10 2008
- RE: Supers Infertile? - VFR, Tue Oct 7 21:13:07 2008
- RE: Supers Infertile? - AndreasE, Tue Oct 7 21:19:48 2008
- How about some facts? - GainesReptiles, Wed Oct 8 18:58:56 2008
- RE: Supers Infertile? - Tracy Barker, Thu Oct 9 05:45:30 2008
- RE: Supers Infertile? - brd, Thu Oct 9 20:15:37 2008
|
