![]() | mobile - desktop |
![]() |
|
News & Events:
|
| [ Login ] [ User Prefs ] [ Search Forums ] [ Back to Main Page ] [ Back to Ball Pythons ] |
Posted by: Balzo at Tue Oct 28 19:27:52 2008 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by Balzo ] so you theorize that the "pied markers" seen in wild animals are actually a marker for another inherited trait that determines the amount of white on a Piebald. In other words if the het has no markers in theory it should be a "low white" piebald? So if the original line proved by Pete Kahl was also a carrier of this trait then anything from that line could be possible carriers as well and hence have the "marker". | ||
>> Next Message: RE: Forgive my ignorance but I am new - BrandonSander, Tue Oct 28 20:09:29 2008 | ||
<< Previous Message: RE: Pied debate. - BrandonSander, Tue Oct 28 17:25:02 2008 | ||
|
|
|
|