so you theorize that the "pied markers" seen in wild animals are actually a marker for another inherited trait that determines the amount of white on a Piebald. In other words if the het has no markers in theory it should be a "low white" piebald? So if the original line proved by Pete Kahl was also a carrier of this trait then anything from that line could be possible carriers as well and hence have the "marker".



I just wasn't sure if I was understanding you right. The whole "pied marker" thing has been pretty confusing wihout experience of breeding them to base it on (maybe one day I will).



Do you have a copy of the paper you wrote available? Is it published where I can find it. It might help shed some light on my confusion.



Thanks

[ Hide Replies ]

• Pied debate. - Rick247, Tue Oct 28 13:14:49 2008
• RE: Pied debate. - jaymiller242, Tue Oct 28 13:37:29 2008
• I'm told its a gamble... - illbeyoursoldier, Tue Oct 28 14:02:30 2008
• RE: I'm told its a gamble... - Rick247, Tue Oct 28 15:49:09 2008
• RE: Pied debate. - jasballs, Tue Oct 28 15:14:09 2008
• RE: Pied debate. - Rick247, Tue Oct 28 15:50:24 2008
• Photo evidence - dbherp, Tue Oct 28 16:42:49 2008
• More Photo evidence - huff747, Wed Oct 29 10:00:40 2008
• RE: Pied debate. - BrandonSander, Tue Oct 28 17:25:02 2008
• RE: Pied debate. - ThaGirls, Tue Oct 28 17:56:28 2008
• Forgive my ignorance but I am new - Balzo, Tue Oct 28 19:27:52 2008
• RE: Forgive my ignorance but I am new - BrandonSander, Tue Oct 28 20:09:29 2008
• It's varaible - jluman, Tue Oct 28 18:56:46 2008
• RE: Pied debate. - morphed, Wed Oct 29 11:58:24 2008
• RE: Pied debate. - RandyRemington, Wed Oct 29 22:22:53 2008