![]() | mobile - desktop |
![]() |
![]() |
News & Events:
|
| [ Login ] [ User Prefs ] [ Search Forums ] [ Back to Main Page ] [ Back to Herpetological News ] |
Posted by: Ferdelance_1 at Sat Feb 8 19:32:47 2003 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by Ferdelance_1 ] The toddler was supposedly bitten on the finger, therefore, I would think that local necrosis would be limited to this particular extremity. Even though swelling has been known to spread up the arm, why would the surgical procedure, "amputation" ,of the entire hand be required to save the patient? Would it be do to the fact that a toddler was bitten, and not an adult? | ||
>> Next Message: Just the usual media BS... - WW, Sun Feb 9 14:00:22 2003 | ||
<< Previous Message: ZA Press: Toddler in risk of loosing hand after snakebite - W von Papineäu, Sat Feb 8 08:12:55 2003 | ||
|
|
|
|