Duh..."penetrance". New word. I looked it up. Still lost.
You are agreeing with my statement and not being facetious? correct?

But there still is the question of whether or not a certain morph is Co-dominant. Here is an example -- "Jungle": Pattern anomaly genetically reproducible where there are degrees of expression, thought to be Co-dominant. Another of the same might be "Squaretail"

Is "Het for" possible with these pattern morphs in the case of a low expression or no expression individual?

jsc
-----
"As hard as I've tried, just can't NOT do this"
John Crickmer

[ Show Entire Thread ]