Duh..."penetrance". New word. I looked it up. Still lost.

You are agreeing with my statement and not being facetious? correct?



But there still is the question of whether or not a certain morph is Co-dominant. Here is an example -- "Jungle": Pattern anomaly genetically reproducible where there are degrees of expression, thought to be Co-dominant. Another of the same might be "Squaretail"



Is "Het for" possible with these pattern morphs in the case of a low expression or no expression individual?



jsc
-----
"As hard as I've tried, just can't NOT do this"

John Crickmer

[ Hide Replies ]

• GENETICS - jscrick, Sun Dec 14 11:23:57 2008
• RE: GENETICS - rainbowsrus, Sun Dec 14 14:22:13 2008
• RE: GENETICS - jhsulliv, Sun Dec 14 15:54:23 2008
• RE: GENETICS - jscrick, Mon Dec 15 09:12:26 2008
• RE: GENETICS - natsamjosh, Mon Dec 15 10:25:22 2008
• RE: GENETICS - Paul Hollander, Mon Dec 15 11:24:55 2008
• RE: GENETICS - Paul Hollander, Mon Dec 15 14:21:02 2008
• RE: GENETICS - jscrick, Mon Dec 15 15:51:16 2008
• RE: GENETICS - LarM, Mon Dec 15 16:49:46 2008
• RE: GENETICS - Paul Hollander, Mon Dec 15 17:52:48 2008
• RE: GENETICS - LarM, Mon Dec 15 21:59:35 2008
• RE: GENETICS - 13joshsilva, Tue Dec 16 20:32:11 2008
• RE: GENETICS - 13joshsilva, Wed Dec 17 00:54:18 2008
• RE: GENETICS - Paul Hollander, Wed Dec 17 13:59:39 2008
• RE: GENETICS - Paul Hollander, Mon Dec 15 14:25:47 2008
• RE: GENETICS - rainbowsrus, Mon Dec 15 14:33:29 2008
• Great example - LarM, Mon Dec 15 14:36:45 2008
• RE: Great example - Paul Hollander, Mon Dec 15 17:07:13 2008
• RE: Great example - LarM, Mon Dec 15 17:40:34 2008
• RE: Great example - 13joshsilva, Wed Dec 17 01:10:48 2008
• RE: Great example - LarM, Thu Dec 18 20:31:12 2008
• RE: GENETICS - jscrick, Mon Dec 15 15:55:49 2008
• RE: GENETICS - Paul Hollander, Mon Dec 15 17:21:25 2008
• RE: GENETICS - LarM, Sun Dec 14 16:54:31 2008