I'd like to clarify my last regarding this -- I believe, and I could be wrong, but most Bcc aficionados feel that Suriname and Guyanan and XXX Locality Peruvian have an identifiable look to them. I'm not saying it's a law, just a common consensus. Actually it could be the differentiation of Highland from Lowland, now that you mention it.
I'm just saying the animals in question should be designated as XXX "Type", if no better authenticity of origin exists.
This is generic nomenclature, just a little bit more characteristically refined than Bcc.
Of course Locality trumps generic type.
jsc
-----
"As hard as I've tried, just can't NOT do this"
John Crickmer

[ Show Entire Thread ]