Posted by:
Jon R
at Fri Feb 6 22:57:18 2009 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by Jon R ]
I don't believe that for a second, do you??
It's a totally different look. And since the Gap anery and hypo genes are so intertwined, don't you think a hypo Sanderson would have popped up by now if the Gaps were used to produce the anery Sanderson's?? If you go check Dan's records, I don't think you will find an anery Gap that's not at least poss. het for hypo. The chance that hypo would have been introduced is greater than not in this case..
But is there is any question still remaining about the authenticity of the Sanderson line, it would be a good thing if it turned out to be something more than simple recessive. That would bust the Gap myth for sure.
[ Hide Replies ]
|
RE: Het's - Jon R, Fri Feb 6 22:57:18 2009