Posted by:
terryd
at Fri Feb 20 00:03:31 2009 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by terryd ]
Tricolor wrote:
"most of SD and Montana is strange in that the average milk snake from there looks nothing like the classic Pales found in N. NE and S. SD."
Hmm, After only seeing a few South Dakota Pales I'd have to agree w/ you, even Walt Deptula stated as much about South Dakota Pales years ago. "South Dakota animals, particularly those from the Black Hills territory, almost appear to be a different subspecies."
I think it will be interesting to see more of these South Dakota multistrata over the next few years to try and get a better handle on what is going on w/ them as they are quiet diffrent looking animals.
Now Montana Pales I'd have to disagree w/ you Brian. There are plenty of classic looking Pales found here that will rival any found in NE. You just haven't seen enough yet.
All field found Montana multistrata.







-Dell

[ Hide Replies ]
- Pales and Reds - thoughts and reflection - Sunherp, Tue Feb 17 11:08:31 2009

- RE: Pales and Reds - thoughts and reflection - shannon brown, Tue Feb 17 11:18:35 2009

- Wow!!! - Sunherp, Tue Feb 17 11:21:55 2009

- RE: Pales and Reds - thoughts and reflection - snake_bit, Tue Feb 17 13:09:39 2009
- RE: Maps - terryd, Tue Feb 17 16:48:34 2009
- Nice work! - Sunherp, Tue Feb 17 17:10:21 2009
- RE: Maps - snake_bit, Tue Feb 17 18:04:05 2009
- RE: Maps - Dniles, Wed Feb 18 06:11:50 2009
- RE: Pales and Reds - thoughts and reflection - Dniles, Wed Feb 18 06:09:38 2009
- RE: Pales and Reds - thoughts and reflection - cn013, Wed Feb 18 14:33:07 2009

- RE: Pales and Reds - thoughts and reflection - Tony D, Wed Feb 18 15:02:42 2009
- Tony! - Sunherp, Wed Feb 18 15:40:48 2009
- RE: Pales and Reds - thoughts and reflection - tricolorbrian, Thu Feb 19 17:55:44 2009
- ........wow...the more I look.... - jyohe, Fri Feb 20 12:38:12 2009
|