Ed, what is your alternative to what's being proposed here? And I say that nicely. One way or another, the gov't IS going to get involved here, make no mistake about it. Better the situation that you can deal with, as opposed to the one you can't.

And we need to "head them off at the pass", as it were.
-----
1.0 Blackheaded pythons
2.4 Woma
3.2 Aussie Olives
1.1 Timors
1.3 Bloods
2.2 IJ Carpets
2.0 Coastal Carpets
1.3 Macklotts
1.2 F2 Carpondros
2.0 Jungle Carpet
1.0 Jag IJCP
0.1 Carpondro
1.1 Brazilian Rainbow boas
1.1 Striped Bolivian Boas
0.1 child, CB
0.1 wife, WC

[ Hide Replies ]

• USARK Introduces Landmark Legislation - USARK, Tue Feb 24 17:06:22 2009
• RE: USARK Introduces Landmark Legislation - TOM_CRUTCHFIELD, Tue Feb 24 19:18:36 2009
• RE: USARK Introduces Landmark Legislation - HappyHillbilly, Wed Feb 25 13:07:48 2009
• Correction!!! - HappyHillbilly, Wed Feb 25 13:10:25 2009
• RE: USARK Introduces Landmark Legislation - TOM_CRUTCHFIELD, Wed Feb 25 14:02:01 2009
• RE: USARK Introduces Landmark Legislation - USARK, Wed Feb 25 15:14:20 2009
• RE: USARK Introduces Landmark Legislation - HappyHillbilly, Wed Feb 25 20:23:43 2009
• RE: USARK Introduces Landmark Legislatio - brhaco, Wed Feb 25 08:48:16 2009
• RE: USARK Introduces Landmark Legislation - EricWI, Wed Feb 25 09:53:05 2009
• RE: USARK Introduces Landmark Legislation - wireptile, Wed Feb 25 12:41:01 2009
• RE: USARK Introduces Landmark Legislation - TOM_CRUTCHFIELD, Wed Feb 25 13:11:06 2009
• RE: USARK Introduces Landmark Legislation - wstreps, Wed Feb 25 13:55:55 2009
• RE: USARK Introduces Landmark Legislation - USARK, Wed Feb 25 15:19:32 2009
• a contrary view - bobclark, Wed Feb 25 13:55:46 2009
• RE: a contrary view - TOM_CRUTCHFIELD, Wed Feb 25 14:22:33 2009
• RE: a contrary view - bobclark, Wed Feb 25 15:50:31 2009
• RE: a contrary view - USARK, Wed Feb 25 16:05:32 2009
• RE: a contrary view - bobclark, Wed Feb 25 21:38:22 2009
• RE: a contrary view - USARK, Thu Feb 26 06:10:30 2009
• RE: a contrary view - TOM_CRUTCHFIELD, Wed Feb 25 17:15:46 2009
• RE: a contrary view - USARK, Wed Feb 25 15:38:45 2009
• RE: a contrary view - bobclark, Wed Feb 25 15:44:03 2009
• RE: a contrary view - USARK, Wed Feb 25 15:58:08 2009
• RE: a contrary view - natsamjosh, Wed Feb 25 16:55:28 2009
• RE: a contrary view - USARK, Wed Feb 25 17:34:55 2009
• BTW - USARK, Wed Feb 25 17:43:34 2009
• RE: a contrary view - natsamjosh, Wed Feb 25 20:35:42 2009
• RE: a contrary view - Jaykis, Thu Feb 26 09:38:45 2009
• RE: a contrary view - natsamjosh, Thu Feb 26 10:39:36 2009
• RE: a contrary view - Jaykis, Thu Feb 26 19:16:53 2009
• RE: USARK Introduces Landmark Legislation - Katrina, Fri Mar 6 13:26:37 2009