I don't think it is odd...
not if the original animal had multiple phenotypes.

Why is it so hard for everyone to believe that the aberrant patterns are not necessarily linked to hypomelanism.

How come the jungles were never put under so much critique,
how come jungles were just accepted as being "co-dom" when apparently the only "super" jungle that supposedly produced was the very first one...and none since, back when they were "hets"....
Why are jungles becoming less and less aberrant?
Why is it becoming more and more difficult to determine whether an animal is jungle or not?
These are the questions we should all be asking of every possible mutation, not to deface anybodys project, but to better understand what is happening and to better the animals that we produce...
Just to make sure Im not off base, I am not bashing on the jungles, they are a beautiful morph and there will be a bright future with them as soon as we get them outcrossed some more.
-----
Robert McPhee
www.BBCExotics.com

[ Hide Replies ]

• Yes, you may have - robertmcphee, Tue Mar 17 08:52:17 2009
• This was supposed to post below - robertmcphee, Tue Mar 17 08:56:54 2009
• RE: Yes, you may have - Guy Scavone II, Tue Mar 17 10:11:45 2009
• RE: Yes, you may have - VFR, Tue Mar 17 10:24:33 2009
• RE: Yes, you may have - Guy Scavone II, Tue Mar 17 10:27:56 2009
• RE: Yes, you may have - VFR, Tue Mar 17 10:34:35 2009
• RE: Yes, you may have - VFR, Tue Mar 17 10:38:54 2009
• RE: Yes, you may have - Guy Scavone II, Tue Mar 17 10:45:45 2009
• RE: Yes, you may have - VFR, Tue Mar 17 10:52:52 2009
• RE: Yes, you may have - Guy Scavone II, Tue Mar 17 11:05:33 2009
• I don't think luck played in that one... - robertmcphee, Tue Mar 17 11:05:51 2009
• RE: Yes, you may have - Guy Scavone II, Tue Mar 17 10:40:48 2009
• RE: Yes, you may have - VFR, Tue Mar 17 10:47:14 2009
• RE: Yes, you may have - Guy Scavone II, Tue Mar 17 10:49:55 2009
• RE: Yes, you may have - VFR, Tue Mar 17 11:11:54 2009
• RE: Yes, you may have - Guy Scavone II, Tue Mar 17 11:15:08 2009
• RE: Yes, you may have - rainbowsrus, Tue Mar 17 12:11:30 2009
• RE: Yes, you may have - Guy Scavone II, Tue Mar 17 16:18:01 2009
• RE: Yes, you may have - rainbowsrus, Tue Mar 17 16:28:53 2009
• RE: Yes, you may have - robertmcphee, Tue Mar 17 17:53:15 2009
• RE: Yes, you may have - EricIvins, Tue Mar 17 18:43:39 2009
• RE: Yes, you may have - boaphile, Tue Mar 17 20:09:36 2009
• RE: Yes, you may have - rainbowsrus, Tue Mar 17 12:08:16 2009
• I have recently compromised my project - robertmcphee, Tue Mar 17 11:15:22 2009
• RE: I have recently compromised my project - Guy Scavone II, Tue Mar 17 11:18:41 2009
• I respect everyones opinion, even those - robertmcphee, Tue Mar 17 11:39:56 2009
• RE: I respect everyones opinion, even those - Guy Scavone II, Tue Mar 17 11:43:44 2009
• Very nice conversation...Thanks again np - robertmcphee, Tue Mar 17 12:00:14 2009
• RE: I have recently compromised my project - VFR, Tue Mar 17 11:19:07 2009
• RE: I have recently compromised my project - Guy Scavone II, Tue Mar 17 11:22:46 2009
• RE: I have recently compromised my project - robertmcphee, Tue Mar 17 11:28:52 2009
• RE: I have recently compromised my project - Guy Scavone II, Tue Mar 17 11:40:30 2009
• Theres something we can completely agree - robertmcphee, Tue Mar 17 11:41:47 2009
• RE: Yes, you may have - LarM, Tue Mar 17 11:56:53 2009
• RE: Yes, you may have - robertmcphee, Tue Mar 17 12:02:08 2009
• Here's a few from my Cyclone litter - nickstone, Tue Mar 17 12:24:47 2009
• A few thoughts... - boaphile, Tue Mar 17 15:53:44 2009
• RE: A few thoughts... - robertmcphee, Tue Mar 17 17:45:55 2009