Posted by:
amcroyals
at Sat May 2 10:01:47 2009 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by amcroyals ]
why would I want to join a organization that has current views that are not in my best interest?
Sure, unity is best, but I'm not joining any organization that doesn't have my best interest in account!
PIJAC has been around for a while... Sure. They have strong connects in DC... Sure. There views as currently drafted are not in my best interest!
The "grass roots army" of the reptile nation is growing almost exponetially! I'm confident the number of "little guys" out there will be more than happy to take a stand if/when needed! The letter and phone call campaign was just a sneak preview of what is still to come!
For the record, I'm not "bickering"! I am stating facts! I have a vested interest in this fight just as much as anyone! When PIJAC wants to come to the table, drafting something that has the "little guy's" best interest in account, I'll still be here ready and willing to join forces! Until then...........,
Regards,
[ Hide Replies ]
- Bill Brant on HR669 and NRIP - Albey, Fri May 1 16:52:38 2009
- Compromise?....... - amcroyals, Fri May 1 23:23:04 2009
- RE: Compromise?....... - Oz, Sat May 2 05:55:51 2009
- RE: Compromise?....... - TerryHeuring, Sat May 2 09:28:24 2009
- my thoughts also,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, - RoyalVariations, Sat May 2 11:02:50 2009
- RE: my thoughts also,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, - amcroyals, Sat May 2 12:22:23 2009
- RE: Bill Brant on HR669 and NRIP - stu, Sat May 2 06:17:01 2009
- RE: Bill Brant on HR669 and NRIP - Oz, Sat May 2 06:34:33 2009
- RE: Bill Brant on HR669 and NRIP - brhaco, Sat May 2 08:21:07 2009
- RE: Bill Brant on HR669 and NRIP - stu, Sat May 2 08:30:42 2009
- RE: Bill Brant on HR669 and NRIP - TOM_CRUTCHFIELD, Sat May 2 09:58:42 2009
- RE: Bill Brant on HR669 and NRIP - TOM_CRUTCHFIELD, Sat May 2 10:07:13 2009
- Very well put... - amcroyals, Sat May 2 10:10:44 2009
- Bill AND Tom,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, - RoyalVariations, Sat May 2 11:10:10 2009
- RE: Bill AND Tom,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, - stu, Sat May 2 12:43:41 2009
- RE: Bill AND Tom,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, - RoyalVariations, Sat May 2 13:58:50 2009
- RE: Bill AND Tom,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, - TerryHeuring, Sat May 2 14:05:00 2009
- RE: Bill AND Tom,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, - wstreps, Sat May 2 14:57:56 2009
- RE: Bill AND Tom,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, - RoyalVariations, Sat May 2 15:05:00 2009
- RE: Bill AND Tom,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, - wstreps, Sat May 2 15:34:28 2009
- RE: Bill AND Tom,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, - amcroyals, Sat May 2 18:47:50 2009
- RE: Bill Brant on HR669 and NRIP - stu, Sat May 2 08:28:36 2009
RE: Bill Brant on HR669 and NRIP - amcroyals, Sat May 2 10:01:47 2009
- RE: Bill Brant on HR669 and NRIP - wstreps, Sat May 2 12:19:42 2009
- RE: Bill Brant on HR669 and NRIP - Thomas S., Sat May 2 11:19:59 2009
- What is a "reasonable comprmoise"? - jason, Sat May 2 09:22:54 2009
- RE: Bill Brant on HR669 and NRIP - wstreps, Sat May 2 11:50:04 2009
- RE: Bill Brant on HR669 and NRIP - evansnakes, Sat May 2 22:13:41 2009
|