G'day Ray,



you shouldn't feel offended every time. Just relax and take it this way: As the source you refer to in your paper is hard to come by with, WW just gave us the oppertunity to get the paper from a "more available" source. As sundberg said, I don't want to buy books for just a reference mentioned in an article



Cheers,

Wulf



btw.: When ever you got something new, you do the same This must be real love...you can't live without (or at least it wouldn't be that much fun), right
-----
http://www.leiopython.de ,

http://www.herpers-digest.com

[ Hide Replies ]

• Australian Green Pythons - DNA Study Needed - richardwells, Sun Sep 14 08:12:31 2003
• Support for most W and W taxonomy (from 1983/5) - rayhoser, Mon Sep 15 02:47:10 2003
• RE: Support for most W and W taxonomy (from 1983/5) - Tormato, Sun Sep 21 05:30:52 2003
• Hawkei - see Hoser book for explanation - rayhoser, Sun Sep 21 18:41:52 2003
• DNA study published - WW, Sun Sep 28 11:12:18 2003
• MMMM... - rayhoser, Sun Sep 28 17:46:49 2003
• ROFLMAO!!! - WW, Sun Sep 28 23:33:35 2003
• But - let us all know how your pet Acanthophis crotalusei Hoser 1998 is? - rayhoser, Mon Sep 29 02:42:43 2003
• RE: MMMM... - wulf, Sun Sep 28 23:39:48 2003
• RE: Ray Hoser and Chondropython - Publish and Perish - richardwells, Sat Oct 4 02:23:06 2003
• Mmmm - Chondro paper - rayhoser, Sat Oct 4 19:10:16 2003
• RE: Ray Hoser's Cryptic Crap on Chondropython - richardwells, Sun Oct 5 05:30:00 2003
• Mmm... - rayhoser, Sun Oct 5 06:55:17 2003
• RE: DNA study published - RSNewton, Sun Oct 5 00:51:01 2003
• RE: Australian Green Pythons - DNA Study Needed - RSNewton, Sun Oct 5 00:42:32 2003