Posted by:
USARK
at Thu Jun 11 19:40:45 2009 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by USARK ]
Preexisting law remains in effect. CT already had some pretty restrictive laws. HR6552 has dropped all reference to reptiles on its banned list. Any laws that were already in effect must be observed. The only change for reptiles is a provision relating to disposition of animals (including reptiles) that are already being held ILLEGALLY... under current law. HR6552 does not add any new restrictions to reptiles that are being held LEGALLY in the state of CT. ALL REPTILES HAVE BEEN DROPPED FROM THE BANNED LIST OF HR6552.
I am not an attorney, but I do have quite a bit of experience with this kind of stuff. This is my reading. I know it is confusing the way CT handles amendments. When they update the HR6552 document with all the new amendments it will be much easier to read. We will soon put out an email blast that will explain how the whole thing unfolded.
Read Amendment to HR6552 Dropping Reptiles from Banned List
-----
Andrew Wyatt
President USARK
[ Hide Replies ]
- Connecticut Animal Ban Passed . . . - BrucenBruce, Tue Jun 9 18:59:40 2009
- RE: Connecticut Animal Ban Passed . . . - CSRAJim, Tue Jun 9 19:10:30 2009
- RE: Connecticut Animal Ban Passed . . . - jpenney, Wed Jun 10 02:01:39 2009
- RE: Connecticut Animal Ban Passed . . . - chelidman, Wed Jun 10 05:21:39 2009
- RE: Connecticut Animal Ban Passed . . . - Katrina, Thu Jun 11 09:02:45 2009
 Reptiles dropped from Banned Animals - USARK, Thu Jun 11 19:40:45 2009
- USARK and its efforts,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, - RoyalVariations, Fri Jun 12 12:38:03 2009
- reasons why,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, - RoyalVariations, Fri Jun 12 12:57:16 2009
- RE: reasons why,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, - Tracy Barker, Sat Jun 13 10:27:55 2009
- RE:ANDREW A BIG CONGRATS - TOM_CRUTCHFIELD, Wed Jun 10 07:51:18 2009
- RE: Connecticut Animal Ban Passed . . . - mingdurga, Thu Jun 11 19:17:58 2009
|
