John,



Sorry man…Regarding axioms, things are what they are…Think about it…Does any of the bureaucratic obsession regarding non-native, invasive species make any sense to you? True, it IS a problem but, unless the government is prepared to end ALL inter-state and foreign trade, they WILL not solve the problem! Their sole concern about this stuff is “anthropologic” but, nature is excluded…



Can you say migratory birds? Could one of the “viruses” that they carry with them “mutate” into something really bad? Well we already know that viruses mutate into things that are not good for animals and plants…Funny that they do NOT seek to “mitigate” this “potential” problem do they? In fact, as part of the “grants” programs to the states, they are working on “protecting” these “habitats” and creating more of them…



What about the increase of orca pods (and short fin mako sharks) in the Gulf of Mexico? Some of these pods are relatively permanent there now and they are there because of the tuna…The tuna are there in larger numbers because of the animals associated with the “reefs” surrounding the natural gas rigs off the coast of Alabama, Mississippi and Louisiana…



The government even created a very large “reef” to encourage fish when they scuttled the USS Orskany off of the Florida coast...Meaning a few years after the Orskany is established as a reef “ecosystem”, there will be makos and orcas there as well (feeding on the tuna). This “reef wreck” isn’t far from the shore at all.



The scientists are studying the orca’s right now and I suspect that if there is an “anthropologic” threat to them, well they’ll regulate even more controls than currently exist…



The information regarding this MAB stuff (and the UN/UNESCO) wasn’t easy to find but, it is “out there”…If I can find it, then it should be relatively easy for a “trained” journalist to find it as well but, thus far it’s ZIP, ZERO, NAH-DAH from them…



This brings up two possible questions…Is the media this incompetent (in that they don’t report it because they just don’t know themselves)? Or is it that they DO know and are withholding it? Neither scenario is good for our republic and freedom here…



We as a country saw this MAB “vision” back in the 90’s…Remember that fiasco that resulted in the country from the UN’s “visit” to Yellowstone National Park and that map that showed the country divided up into “core areas”, “buffer zones” and the “transition areas” (where the people live, work, etc)? That was about 10 years ago…As a result of that “exposure”, it went “low profile” but it didn’t go away…



One of these MAB’s currently exists in the United States…It’s called the Southern Appalachian MAB (SAMAB)…The first core area (legally defined and protected) of this MAB project was the Great Smokey Mountains National Park…It now is found in some seven states (as far south as Georgia)…That’s a very large buffer area…



Again, sorry man and I wish I was joking…



Later,

Jim.


-----
CSRAJim

[ Show Entire Thread ]