Posted by:
Ken_kaniff
at Tue Sep 15 12:53:17 2009 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by Ken_kaniff ]
I'm not sure why you are turning this around and trying to put me on the spot, I'm not the one that considers individual variation a "morph." I don't claim to be a collector, I don't claim to have these morphs, I don't claim anything!! The whole "my pair is bigger than your pair" argument does not apply in this scenario. I have absolutely nothing to prove. All I'm saying is that your so called morphs look normal to me. That's it in a nutshell. Ken.
[ Hide Replies ]
|