Nope...no grandfather cause. When the ROC law came out, owners had 6 months to comply. Perhaps that was the grandfather clause portion.



It seems that the FWC would give him the option to comply. I mean, isn't this the type of ownership they want? Here's a guy committed to long term care of his snakes, understands the danger and keeps his young son away, and has built a separate and seemingly locked enclosure. The snakes appear well fed and appropriately sized. Granted, it's not the enclosure I would use, but if the FWC doesn't approve, why not educate the owner and return the snakes if/when he complies?

[ Hide Replies ]

• Is there a "grandfather clause"? - Jaykis, Fri Sep 11 14:15:33 2009
• RE: Is there a "grandfather clause"? - laurarfl, Fri Sep 11 18:40:53 2009
• RE: Is there a "grandfather clause"? - Jaykis, Fri Sep 11 19:20:30 2009
• Then there's the 400 pound python story - laurarfl, Sat Sep 12 08:23:25 2009
• RE: Then there's the 400 pound python story - bivittatus, Sat Sep 12 09:05:05 2009
• RE: Then there's the 400 pound python story - Jaykis, Sat Sep 12 10:30:11 2009
• RE: Then there's the 400 pound python story - Pithons, Sun Sep 13 01:55:29 2009
• RE: Then there's the 400 pound python story - laurarfl, Sun Sep 13 09:31:08 2009
• RE: Is there a "grandfather clause"? - TwoSnakes, Sat Sep 12 16:10:11 2009
• The snake was obese.... - Jaykis, Sat Sep 12 19:25:43 2009
• RE: The snake was obese.... - Pithons, Sun Sep 13 01:09:13 2009
• RE: Is there a "grandfather clause"? - Pithons, Sun Sep 13 01:26:06 2009