IMHO separate names for two lines that might eventually be reasonably proved to be the same (not sure it can ever be completely proven without genetic mapping) is a lot better than the same name for different morphs. I don't find mystic vs. phantom confusing at all but am still not sure which woma anybody has and which woma makes pearl (and both mutations named woma are from NERD so it’s not even a case of another breeder jumping on an established name).

At this point I would say it's up to phantom to prove that it's the same as mystic and can make a mystic potion with mojave. I don't doubt that it can but some times I'm a bit of a stickler for proof and a phantommojave looking like mystic potion would be one step closer to proving phantom and mystic the same exact morph. There could still be subtle differences where one or the other might be better in certain combos but now that we've seen the mysticmojave combo we know that's awesome.

[ Hide Replies ]

• THE YEAR OF THE MYSTIC's - anthony james mc, Mon Oct 5 01:40:17 2009
• RE: THE YEAR OF THE MYSTIC's - ChrisPar, Mon Oct 5 02:07:15 2009
• RE: THE YEAR OF THE MYSTIC's - evansnakes, Mon Oct 5 02:44:07 2009
• RE: THE YEAR OF THE MYSTIC's - anthony james mc, Mon Oct 5 03:03:22 2009
• RE: THE YEAR OF THE MYSTIC's - kingofspades, Mon Oct 5 05:44:36 2009
• RE: THE YEAR OF THE MYSTIC's - anthony james mc, Mon Oct 5 06:55:15 2009
• RE: THE YEAR OF THE MYSTIC's - RandyRemington, Mon Oct 5 08:44:55 2009
• RE: THE YEAR OF THE MYSTIC's - TOM_CRUTCHFIELD, Mon Oct 5 11:13:01 2009
• RE: THE YEAR OF THE MYSTIC's - joshhutto, Mon Oct 5 03:05:57 2009
• RE: THE YEAR OF THE MYSTIC's - anthony james mc, Mon Oct 5 03:07:26 2009
• RE: THE YEAR OF THE MYSTIC's - alicecobb, Mon Oct 5 04:14:18 2009
• RE: THE YEAR OF THE MYSTIC's - mrtigger, Tue Oct 6 14:57:29 2009
• hold the name... - FastDad, Mon Oct 5 04:37:27 2009
• RE: THE YEAR OF THE MYSTIC's - jason, Mon Oct 5 04:38:07 2009
• RE: THE YEAR OF THE MYSTIC's - anthony james mc, Mon Oct 5 15:00:16 2009
• RE: THE YEAR OF THE MYSTIC's - snakedr, Mon Oct 5 07:57:06 2009
• RE: THE YEAR OF THE MYSTIC's - anthony james mc, Mon Oct 5 08:08:27 2009
• Congratulations Anthony! - Albey, Mon Oct 5 09:33:26 2009
• RE: THE YEAR OF THE MYSTIC's - CrestedGecko.com, Tue Oct 6 09:52:32 2009
• RE: THE YEAR OF THE MYSTIC's - dwherp, Mon Oct 5 08:09:46 2009
• RE: THE YEAR OF THE MYSTIC's - Shane Kinney, Mon Oct 5 10:13:31 2009
• RE: THE YEAR OF THE MYSTIC's - anthony james mc, Mon Oct 5 10:50:47 2009
• RE: THE YEAR OF THE MYSTIC's - mlpetros, Mon Oct 5 16:56:48 2009
• RE: THE YEAR OF THE MYSTIC's - anthony james mc, Mon Oct 5 23:54:48 2009
• Nice Work Anthony!! n/p - lavenderalbino, Mon Oct 5 11:02:39 2009
• RE: THE YEAR OF THE MYSTIC's - royalvariations, Mon Oct 5 11:38:35 2009
• RE: THE YEAR OF THE MYSTIC's - steelersdiehard, Mon Oct 5 14:57:13 2009
• AWESOME!!! Anthony!1 - rkreptiles, Mon Oct 5 17:37:02 2009
• RE: THE YEAR OF THE MYSTIC's - kinderman, Mon Oct 5 19:00:32 2009
• RE: THE YEAR OF THE MYSTIC's THANKS ALL - anthony james mc, Mon Oct 5 23:51:15 2009
• Congrats on the long process - watever, Tue Oct 6 10:45:41 2009
• RE: THE YEAR OF THE MYSTIC's - Coldthumb, Tue Oct 6 16:30:57 2009
• RE: THE YEAR OF THE MYSTIC's - anthony james mc, Tue Oct 6 18:07:12 2009
• RE: THE YEAR OF THE MYSTIC's - rmjreptiles, Wed Oct 7 11:01:46 2009
• RE: THE YEAR OF THE MYSTIC's - anthony james mc, Wed Oct 7 17:17:18 2009