Posted by:
Dniles
at Thu Oct 8 20:50:36 2009 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by Dniles ]
I guess it depends what the definition of hypo is. If it simply means reduced black in the pattern regardless of how dark the black pigement is (e.g. pinstripe or thinner reduced bands), I definately think the sysplia and that eastern above qualify as hypomelanistic animals.
If it means that where the black pigment in the pattern is present (regardless of width of the bands), it is reduced pigment resulting in more a grey or brown look, then I can't tell from those photos but don't think they qualify.
I agree with Jeff that the extreme hypo hondos, hypo cambelli, hypo temporalis, etc. have a different gene and its my belief they are more likely T animals. I do not believe those are "hypo" animals. Therefore, I think the first definition I mentioned above is what hypomelanistic means.
I agree with Dell that the syspila he pictured and the eastern milk above are hypo syspila but most likely not T syspila (although I am only basing this on the pictures, never seen one in person).
I also agree with Dell about YELLING DURING POSTS!! LOL
Dave
[ Show Entire Thread ]
|